DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION UF NAVAL REVURUS
701 S. GOURTHOUSE RDB SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR02889-14
12 August 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy
ag ee ee SSIES SRN TE ONS
re
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0210
of 9 Jul 2014
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that
the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was
advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement
exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4
August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
Statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
and warrants favorable action.
Docket No.NROZESS-14
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to ET1/E-6 from the March 2011
Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16 December
2011 with a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2011.
b. Petitioner is authorized all back pay and allowances
from the effective date forward.
NOTE: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-6 may
also impact on Petitioner's E-7 advancement opportunities. LE
Petitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-7 examination
because the above change had not yet been made, the following
procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity.
Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of
advancement to E-7 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have
peen first eligible. A DD Form 149, a command
endorsement /recommendation, cycle profile sheets, a worksheet,
and a copy of this letter must be included with the request.
The Board will determine whether the request will be approved.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed 1
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
eae a ——————————e——— ee ~ o —-
>a =. ni ho a ee FS
= SS aE
Docket No.NRO2889-14
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
auLhoLicy OL selesence (a), bas beck approved by the Boara on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
12 August 2014
° Rea ED Ft
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02587-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the March 2010, Navy-wide advancement exam with an , effective date of 16 December 2010, and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 June 2011 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13
Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8335-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed_Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12103-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3535 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWF1 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination due to two missing award points. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3580-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/SK2 from the ee v2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...